Liverpool Airport: Balance or just excuses?

A NEW in-depth report highlighting the economic impact of Liverpool Aiport has been written by Tony McDonough for Liverpool Business News, here:

The report highlights how huge the economic cost to the Liverpool City Region would be if the expansion of Liverpool Airport wasn’t given the green light.

At the moment, LJLA contributes an estimated £340 million to the city region each year and supports over 5,000 jobs. But, under the expansion plans this is estimated to increase to over £600 million per year and job creation would rise to over 12,000.

The report goes on to say that the regions economy pre-pandemic was worth £5 billion per year with overseas visitors increasing over the past 10 years. But, with the city’s poor transport links to the airport, foreign investors are stopping short of investing.

So, when Lufthansa announced in December 2021 that it would be launching a new route to its central hub in Frankfurt from LJLA in May 2022 (https://www.liverpoolairport.com/news/2021/12/lufthansa-connects-liverpool-globally) it brought much needed hope – especially at a time when the travel industry was being savaged by the COVID-19 pandemic. The launch of this new route is seen as boost in confidence for not just the airport, but the city region itself and could open up new ‘runways’ of investment in the future.

As I’ve mentioned in my previous blog post, there is big opposition to the plans for LJLA to expand, so are the reasons given an object of balance? Or are they just excuses?

Firstly, business leaders in the region are calling for ‘open dialogue’, and say the “anti-airport sentiment”, by leaders and decision makers “should be avoided”, and is sending out a “negative message”.

Chief Executive of Liverpool Chamber of Commerce, Paul Cherpeau, says: “We should be working collaboratively with our airport, using it as a tool of our economic recovery and rebuild whilst ensuring it minimises its iversll environmental impact.”

Also in the report by LBN Daily, a blunt statement released by Chairman of Downtown in Business, Frank McKenna says: “The commercial naivety of this resolution beggars belief.

“Do councillors not appreciate the cash, the jobs, the significant benefits the airport, directly and indirectly, brings to the city region economy? Did they not question the impact that this will have on the Freeport initiative?”

The opposition seems to be coming from Liverpool City Council leaders itself and they’re using the ‘net zero carbon targets’, as the excuse as to opposition to the airports expansion.

Whilst acknowledging the airport “supports a huge amount of investment and jobs in our city and it’s success is vital to our economic heath”, Liverpool Mayor Joanne Anderson is using the excuse of the council having “declared a climate emergency”, and the regions “commitments to a net zero carbon city and country”, as the reason for opposition. Also, the mayor added that “much had changed”, since the airport first released its masterplan. However, the mayor did add: “Clearly a balance needs to be achieved where economic growth is sustainable for the planet and any airport development in this country would need to be both financially and environmentally sound.”

Metro Mayor, Steve Rotheram also acknowledged the “strategic importance” of LJLA to the region in “terms of international connectivity and as a vital local employer with good, unionised jobs”.

But, in similar fashion to Mayor Joanne Anderson, Mr Rotherham also mentioned: “we must strike a balance between continuing to attract inward investment to our city region and our ambitious net zero targets”.

For me, personally, all I’m hearing is the same excuse being peddled out as to why LJLA shouldn’t expand. Not one person in charge, or who has significant ‘pull’, are coming up with alternative plans for both sides of the argument to work together. It seems we’re going down the ‘normal’ route of debate when we already know how the council are going to vote in future anyway. It seems to be time wasting exercise. But, those who want this expansion (myself included), won’t give up.

I believe that our carbon footprint needs to be reduced, but this can’t be for the sake of progress and better paid jobs for the local economy. Cities such as Manchester and now Leeds are seeing investment by the bucket load, but Liverpool seems to always be stuck in a debate about heritage or net zero and it’s stifling economic growth.

Airlines such as Ryanair are moving routes out of Liverpool and moving them to Manchester and Leeds Bradford Airport is seeing investment and route connections return. This can’t continue and something needs to be done.

LJLA needs this expansion sooner rather than later and we cannot afford to have another situation of debate, delay, debate, delay. We’ve got a plan. Now, we need action. And, the council and its leaders need to back business and allow the airport to be expanded.

The excuses need to stop.

Liverpool Airport: Flight on, flight off?

Liverpool John Lennon Airport. ©Liam Fitzsimmons

THE FIGHT to save Liverpool Airport is beginning… and, Liverpool City Council have a lot to answer for.

Council members, from across different political parties, are coming together to oppose the airports proposed expansion due to the ‘environmental impact’ on the area and Councillor Lena Simic, who chairs the climate change and environment select committee, is leading the opposition.

Councillor Simic told the meeting: “Let’s be clear, nobody wants airport expansion.” Liverpool should “lead the way” when it comes to tackling climate change. The world is a very different place from when the council and airport published their original plans, she added.

The council are now threatening to withdraw council funding from the airport all together. But, it’s unclear what is meant by the funding the council gives to the airport.

The council currently own just 10% of the airport, whilst Peel Group own 45% and Ancala Partners own the other 45%.

According to an article published by Place North West, the airport currently contributes £250 million per year to the Liverpool economy, but if the £100 million expansion got the go ahead, this could potentially rise to £625 million per year.

In both 2018 and 2019, the airport saw more than 5 million passengers travel through it, but in 2021 that figure plummeted to just over 1 million passengers* – partially due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The travel industry, as a whole, is still recovering and it will take time. But, over recent weeks airlines like Ryanair, Easyjet and Wizz Air have all CUT routes from the airport and moved those operations to both Manchester Airport & London Gatwick. If this trend continues, and the council continue to bash the airport at every turn soon there won’t be an airport to discuss.

A big light on the horizon is that the airport has successfully negotiated with Lufthansa to launch services to Frankfurt from May 2022. With passengers using that service allowed to check-in for their final destination in Liverpool and use the Frankfurt hub to fly to hundreds of locations across the globe.

But, if Lufthansa can show confidence in the airport and what it could achieve for them, why can’t city council do the same? Why are they so set on allowing the airport to fail?

The council seem to be giving excuse, after excuse, after excuse as to why they’re withdrawing the funding but, many local people want the expansion to go ahead due to the investment it would bring – in jobs, tourism and money to the local economy.

The expansion would bring more routes to the area, including a London route from British Airways, but the airline currently won’t launch one as it believes the airport needs more investment… and it does!

Don’t get me wrong, I’m a huge supporter of the airport and I want to see it expand and be more successful than it already is. In recent years, it has unveiled great improvements passenger facilities, but it needs to do more.

Executives at the airport have put together a plan of action to expand the airport which includes; expanding the runway, extending and improving the airport terminal buildings and build a solar farm capable of 2.5 KWH’s of electricity per year. You can find out more information about the masterplan here: https://www.liverpoolairport.com/about-ljla/liverpool-john-lennon-airport-master-plan-to-2050

Liverpool Airport Masterplan. Credit: Liverpool John Lennon Airport.

However, Green Party councillor Anna Key, says this goes against the councils aim of becoming carbon neutral by 2030. But, can we really allow our airport to fail for the sake of the councils carbon neutral target? No, we can’t!

Understandably, there will be some sort of impact to the environment, but the airport is putting plans in place to combat that and we can’t stop investment and jobs that people desperately need for the sake of the environment – especially when another airport down the M62 is seeing constant investment and new routes announced each day.

Liverpool City Council really needs to start doing what is right for it’s people and stop using the excuses of environment and heritage to stop the city from moving forward and being stuck in the past. The city is being left behind on numerous fronts and we can’t allow the council to keep doing it.

I, for one, support the expansion of Liverpool John Lennon Airport and I urge others to do the same.

SUPPORT THE LIVERPOOL AIRPORT EXPANSION!

*Credit to Place North West.

LIVE: Budget 2015 REACTION

THIS, is LIVE coverage of reaction to Chancellor George Osborne’s Summer Budget – updated at 14:48. LIVE coverage ended at 14:48.

BUDGET REACTION – Paul Brand, ITV News correspondent on Twitter: 
8 minutes ago
Labour have dubbed northern powerhouse the ‘northern poorhouse’ ‘northern power cut’ and now ‘northern doghouse’ after North East ‘shunned’

BUDGET REACTION – Fran Cowling on Twitter: 
3 minutes ago
When the Tories talk about ‘British Values’ does that entail destroying the welfare state, education, and the NHS ?

BUDGET REACTION – David Daniels on Twitter: 
 1 minute ago
Osborne’s rise in the minimum wage will not apply to those under 25. As if they require less food or heating to get by.

BUDGET REACTION – Victoria Wickham on Twitter: 
 2 minutes ago
Hate to point it out georgie boy, but people under 25 need a living wage too 5

BUDGET REACTION – Siobhan Gabrielle on Twitter: 
33s34 seconds ago
I am so upset about . It was to be expected, but it’s horrific. I can’t say more than that, it’s awful

BUDGET REACTION – Matthew Ferguson on Twitter: 
 1 minute ago
Pleased with the commitment to 2% defence spending. Definitely one of the best announcements from George Osborne!

BUDGET REACTION – Kate Lancaster on Twitter: 
1 minute ago
so many people won’t be able to go to university now because they can’t afford it, education is a right not a privilege

BUDGET REACTION – Caroline Lucas, former Green Party leader on Twitter:
6m6 minutes ago
So disappointed that leadership backs – cynical savage policy that will throw extra 40K children in poverty

BUDGET REACTION – Stephen Noon on Twitter:
26m26 minutes ago
During Labour & Tory said tax credits might be at risk with a . Today is a breathtaking breach of faith

BUDGET REACTION – Owen Jones on Twitter: 
23s ago:
”Any increase in the minimum wage is welcome. But by 2020, with inflation and tax credit cuts, in work poverty will still be the reality.”

BUDGET – REACTION: acting-leader, Harriet Harman wants to transpenine rail route re-instated. 5

Your voice does matter!

AS you’ve probably heard thousands of times already this year, there’s a General Election happening on Thursday May 7th. Now, you might be sick of hearing about it, but to be honest it needs to keep being talked about.

Many people right across the country believe they shouldn’t vote for any political party because ”it won’t make a difference” or ”they’re all the same”, but we need to put these thoughts to rest.

Yes, over the past decade MP’s haven’t done themselves any favors by using tax-payer funded money to fund their own lavish lifestyles, and only doing things that would significantly help themselves, but we need to put this to one side… For now.

The election on May 7th, is not like any other we’ve seen before. We are literally fighting to keep our communities (or what is left of them) together. It’s the most important election in a generation. It really is.

Over the past 5 years, David Cameron and his Conservative party have destroyed our country under the guise of ”We’re all in this together”, but we’re not all in this together. As everyone knows, with the Conservatives in power, the poor have been hit the hardest, and the rich have become richer. The rich support the rich. That is what our country has become.

The heart of our communities have been ripped out, libraries and leisure centres for the young have been shut down, over one million people are now having to rely on food banks because their wages aren’t rising, and bills are rising higher than ever before. This just isn’t right and We cannot go on like this. Families in 21st century Britain should be not be relying on handouts.

To vote in this General Election, you have to register to vote. The deadline for registering is April 20th and after that you will no longer be eligible to vote. Some of you may say there is ”no point” or ”my vote won’t make a difference”, but it can… and it will.

To reiterate, this is the most important General Election in a generation. Your voice does matter. It will make a difference. Please register to vote!

Register to vote before April 20th, by visiting the following website: https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote

Will he, won’t he…

UPDATED.

YOU might not know this, but there’s an election happening in May, and in the run-up to it, the main party leaders will take part in TV election debates. But, over the past week they have been thrown into disarray. Let me tell you why…

During the campaign of 2010, the leaders of the three main political parties – Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrats, all took part in a three-way television debate, in which they answered questions from the public about economic, health and social issues. The debates screened on the BBC, ITV and Sky News were watched by over 22 million viewers, and were seen as a huge success.

Fast forward to late 2014, and the three main broadcasters, now joined by Channel 4, announced their plans for the upcoming General Election – including a return of the TV debates. The BBC and ITV announced their debates would feature the leaders of the Conservative, Labour & Liberal Democrats, although the latter would include UKIP leader Nigel Farage. The third and final debate to air on Channel 4/Sky News would be a head-to-head between David Cameron and Ed Miliband. The debates would take place, every 2 weeks from April 2nd, and continue on April 16th, and end on April 30th – exactly one week before polling day.

Controversy…

When the plans were announced, The Green Party expressed their disappointment at being excluded, and demanded to be included. Their demand was rejected, and the party launched an online petition which gained over 275,000 signatures, and saw a huge surge in membership. The campaign led to the BBC and ITV announcing plans for a seven-way debate, featuring leaders from the UK’s seven main political parties, including the Tories, Labour, Lib Dems, the Greens, UKIP, the SNP and Plaid Cymru. The Greens accepted the new proposals, and congratulated the broadcasters for listening to them.

The first debate is due to take place on Thursday April 2nd on ITV, hosted by ITV News presenter Julie Etchingham; the next on BBC One would air on April 16th, hosted by David Dimbleby; the third and final debate to air on Sky News, would take place on April 30th and be chaired by Jeremy Paxman, with the aftermath hosted by Kay Burley.

However, a few days after the plans were confirmed, the PM announced that he would only take part in ONE of the proposed debates, because he thinks the debates are a waste of his time, specifically if they’re held during the election campaign. Instead, Mr Cameron has held the broadcasters to ”ransom”, by proposing a 90 minute debate with the 6 remaining political leaders, if it is held on Thursday, March 26th – 4 days before campaigning starts.

But, his actions have been criticised by politicians, political commentators, and voters for trying to ”derail the democratic process”, and has even been accused of ”running scared” from the Labour Party, and has been called ”a chicken” by Labour leader Ed Miliband.

The broadcasters have since announced that the debates will still be go ahead, and they’ll be ”empty chairing” the PM, if he doesn’t show up.

But, what do the public think about the debates?

Well, a new poll released by the Sunday Times, shows support for the debates at 69%, but asked if they think a different format should be considered, 21% said it should. Asked if there should be a head-to-head debate between Cameron and Miliband, 42% are in favour, and 42% are against it.

But asked, who the public think are to blame for the breakdown in talks between the broadcasters and political leaders, it’s not good reading for Cameron – over 40% blame the PM for his ”disgraceful” actions, whilst 13% blame the broadcasters.

Today (11/3/15), makes further grim reading for the PM. A new poll released by ComRes for ITV News shows, 64% of voters believe the PM has ”damaged his reputation”, over his refusal to take part, and his ignorance to even answer questions about the debates. Also today, a new digital debate was put forward by Youtube, the Daily Telegraph & The Guardian, which would take place on Monday, March 23rd – which is what the PM wants.

With the pressure from politicians, and now voters anger increasing everyday, will the PM do the right thing, and finally agree to take part in all 3 of the proposed TV debates? Well it remains to be seen whether he’ll give in, or remain ignorant when questioned on the subject.

Whatever happens between now and April 2nd, there is no denying, it will certainly be interesting!

100 days to go…

YOU might not know this, but it’s only 100 days to go, until the General Election on Thursday 7th May 2015, and it promises to be the most exciting election, ever.

During the course of today (27/1/15), we heard a number of stories across newspapers, mobile news apps, and television news programmes, about what each political party is going to do, to secure our vote.

For the Conservative party, they brought out Chancellor George Osborne to tell us, that they are the ”only party” to keep Britain’s economic recovery on track, and that a Labour government would ”wreck the recovery”.

But, what recovery is Mr Osborne talking about? You might say. Many believe there is a ‘North vs South’ recovery happening. With the new jobs being created in the south of the country, whilst the North is not seeing job growth as quickly as the south. The north has seen job growth, but its slow.

Another fact to add in, is wages. Wages in the south are extremely high, compared to the north, because living there is expensive, but people in the north, haven’t seen a wage rise, and with food, energy, and clothing prices still high, the poorest, are becoming poorer.

Labour on the other hand, sent leader Ed Miliband to talk to reporters, choosing to focus on the National Health Service (NHS). The party pledged to train 10,000 more Nurses, to cut spending on bringing in agency staff from abroad, and to pour more money in to the service. ”Under David Cameron, there have been 8000 fewer nurses trained and hospitals have been left scrambling to repair the damage”, Mr Miliband said.

To pay for more investment in the NHS, the party would take money from its new ‘Time to Care’ fund costing £2.5 billion, which would be funded from a higher mansion tax, reclaim money from tax avoidance and, place a levy on tobacco companies. The Conservatives have come out saying Labour would ”lose control” over NHS spending and, plunge the service into a ”black hole”, in which it would never recover from. Jeremy Hunt, Health Secretary even compared Labour, to the new left-wing party in Greece, Syriza.

But, a new Comres poll for ITV News, reveals that the NHS is high on voters agenda, with more people trusting Labour with the NHS, than the Tories. In the same poll though, it reveals that the Conservatives are the most trusted party to look after the economy, and Labour are still struggling to convince voters about their plans.

This election is not just about the main parties though, it’s about the ever-growing popularity of the small parties – particularly UKIP and The Green Party. With trust in politicians at an all-time low, people have turned to the smaller parties to improve their lives, because after decades of either Conservative or Labour governments, they feel nothing has changed for them.

UKIP appeal to working class people in particular because of it’s ‘no nonsense’ approach, and with the party cleverly depicting leader Nigel Farage, as a man who ”loves a pint and cigarette” down his local, they believe he is one of them, and someone who can bring the change they so desperately want.

On the other hand, The Green Party have seen a surge in popularity recently, due to the comments many UKIP candidates have said about gay, black, and disabled people during the past few months, and the fact they were left out of the TV debates in the run-up to the General Election. It added 2,000 members in ONE day amid a blaze of publicity over the issue, with membership soaring past UKIP, and even the Liberal Democrats.

A new poll for Sky News, the ‘Poll of Polls’, has predicted that Labour will be the biggest party, and hold the ‘balance the power’, with 282 seats, 44 seats short of an outright majority of 326 seats. The Conservatives are predicted to have 270 seats.

No matter what people say, or what the politicians do, this will be the closest and, most exciting General Election, ever!