Liverpool Airport: Balance or just excuses?

A NEW in-depth report highlighting the economic impact of Liverpool Aiport has been written by Tony McDonough for Liverpool Business News, here:

The report highlights how huge the economic cost to the Liverpool City Region would be if the expansion of Liverpool Airport wasn’t given the green light.

At the moment, LJLA contributes an estimated £340 million to the city region each year and supports over 5,000 jobs. But, under the expansion plans this is estimated to increase to over £600 million per year and job creation would rise to over 12,000.

The report goes on to say that the regions economy pre-pandemic was worth £5 billion per year with overseas visitors increasing over the past 10 years. But, with the city’s poor transport links to the airport, foreign investors are stopping short of investing.

So, when Lufthansa announced in December 2021 that it would be launching a new route to its central hub in Frankfurt from LJLA in May 2022 (https://www.liverpoolairport.com/news/2021/12/lufthansa-connects-liverpool-globally) it brought much needed hope – especially at a time when the travel industry was being savaged by the COVID-19 pandemic. The launch of this new route is seen as boost in confidence for not just the airport, but the city region itself and could open up new ‘runways’ of investment in the future.

As I’ve mentioned in my previous blog post, there is big opposition to the plans for LJLA to expand, so are the reasons given an object of balance? Or are they just excuses?

Firstly, business leaders in the region are calling for ‘open dialogue’, and say the “anti-airport sentiment”, by leaders and decision makers “should be avoided”, and is sending out a “negative message”.

Chief Executive of Liverpool Chamber of Commerce, Paul Cherpeau, says: “We should be working collaboratively with our airport, using it as a tool of our economic recovery and rebuild whilst ensuring it minimises its iversll environmental impact.”

Also in the report by LBN Daily, a blunt statement released by Chairman of Downtown in Business, Frank McKenna says: “The commercial naivety of this resolution beggars belief.

“Do councillors not appreciate the cash, the jobs, the significant benefits the airport, directly and indirectly, brings to the city region economy? Did they not question the impact that this will have on the Freeport initiative?”

The opposition seems to be coming from Liverpool City Council leaders itself and they’re using the ‘net zero carbon targets’, as the excuse as to opposition to the airports expansion.

Whilst acknowledging the airport “supports a huge amount of investment and jobs in our city and it’s success is vital to our economic heath”, Liverpool Mayor Joanne Anderson is using the excuse of the council having “declared a climate emergency”, and the regions “commitments to a net zero carbon city and country”, as the reason for opposition. Also, the mayor added that “much had changed”, since the airport first released its masterplan. However, the mayor did add: “Clearly a balance needs to be achieved where economic growth is sustainable for the planet and any airport development in this country would need to be both financially and environmentally sound.”

Metro Mayor, Steve Rotheram also acknowledged the “strategic importance” of LJLA to the region in “terms of international connectivity and as a vital local employer with good, unionised jobs”.

But, in similar fashion to Mayor Joanne Anderson, Mr Rotherham also mentioned: “we must strike a balance between continuing to attract inward investment to our city region and our ambitious net zero targets”.

For me, personally, all I’m hearing is the same excuse being peddled out as to why LJLA shouldn’t expand. Not one person in charge, or who has significant ‘pull’, are coming up with alternative plans for both sides of the argument to work together. It seems we’re going down the ‘normal’ route of debate when we already know how the council are going to vote in future anyway. It seems to be time wasting exercise. But, those who want this expansion (myself included), won’t give up.

I believe that our carbon footprint needs to be reduced, but this can’t be for the sake of progress and better paid jobs for the local economy. Cities such as Manchester and now Leeds are seeing investment by the bucket load, but Liverpool seems to always be stuck in a debate about heritage or net zero and it’s stifling economic growth.

Airlines such as Ryanair are moving routes out of Liverpool and moving them to Manchester and Leeds Bradford Airport is seeing investment and route connections return. This can’t continue and something needs to be done.

LJLA needs this expansion sooner rather than later and we cannot afford to have another situation of debate, delay, debate, delay. We’ve got a plan. Now, we need action. And, the council and its leaders need to back business and allow the airport to be expanded.

The excuses need to stop.

Liverpool Airport: Flight on, flight off?

Liverpool John Lennon Airport. ©Liam Fitzsimmons

THE FIGHT to save Liverpool Airport is beginning… and, Liverpool City Council have a lot to answer for.

Council members, from across different political parties, are coming together to oppose the airports proposed expansion due to the ‘environmental impact’ on the area and Councillor Lena Simic, who chairs the climate change and environment select committee, is leading the opposition.

Councillor Simic told the meeting: “Let’s be clear, nobody wants airport expansion.” Liverpool should “lead the way” when it comes to tackling climate change. The world is a very different place from when the council and airport published their original plans, she added.

The council are now threatening to withdraw council funding from the airport all together. But, it’s unclear what is meant by the funding the council gives to the airport.

The council currently own just 10% of the airport, whilst Peel Group own 45% and Ancala Partners own the other 45%.

According to an article published by Place North West, the airport currently contributes £250 million per year to the Liverpool economy, but if the £100 million expansion got the go ahead, this could potentially rise to £625 million per year.

In both 2018 and 2019, the airport saw more than 5 million passengers travel through it, but in 2021 that figure plummeted to just over 1 million passengers* – partially due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The travel industry, as a whole, is still recovering and it will take time. But, over recent weeks airlines like Ryanair, Easyjet and Wizz Air have all CUT routes from the airport and moved those operations to both Manchester Airport & London Gatwick. If this trend continues, and the council continue to bash the airport at every turn soon there won’t be an airport to discuss.

A big light on the horizon is that the airport has successfully negotiated with Lufthansa to launch services to Frankfurt from May 2022. With passengers using that service allowed to check-in for their final destination in Liverpool and use the Frankfurt hub to fly to hundreds of locations across the globe.

But, if Lufthansa can show confidence in the airport and what it could achieve for them, why can’t city council do the same? Why are they so set on allowing the airport to fail?

The council seem to be giving excuse, after excuse, after excuse as to why they’re withdrawing the funding but, many local people want the expansion to go ahead due to the investment it would bring – in jobs, tourism and money to the local economy.

The expansion would bring more routes to the area, including a London route from British Airways, but the airline currently won’t launch one as it believes the airport needs more investment… and it does!

Don’t get me wrong, I’m a huge supporter of the airport and I want to see it expand and be more successful than it already is. In recent years, it has unveiled great improvements passenger facilities, but it needs to do more.

Executives at the airport have put together a plan of action to expand the airport which includes; expanding the runway, extending and improving the airport terminal buildings and build a solar farm capable of 2.5 KWH’s of electricity per year. You can find out more information about the masterplan here: https://www.liverpoolairport.com/about-ljla/liverpool-john-lennon-airport-master-plan-to-2050

Liverpool Airport Masterplan. Credit: Liverpool John Lennon Airport.

However, Green Party councillor Anna Key, says this goes against the councils aim of becoming carbon neutral by 2030. But, can we really allow our airport to fail for the sake of the councils carbon neutral target? No, we can’t!

Understandably, there will be some sort of impact to the environment, but the airport is putting plans in place to combat that and we can’t stop investment and jobs that people desperately need for the sake of the environment – especially when another airport down the M62 is seeing constant investment and new routes announced each day.

Liverpool City Council really needs to start doing what is right for it’s people and stop using the excuses of environment and heritage to stop the city from moving forward and being stuck in the past. The city is being left behind on numerous fronts and we can’t allow the council to keep doing it.

I, for one, support the expansion of Liverpool John Lennon Airport and I urge others to do the same.

SUPPORT THE LIVERPOOL AIRPORT EXPANSION!

*Credit to Place North West.